Friday, 18 February 2011

  • Facebook: Destroyer of Churches & Purveyor of Social Awkwardness


    Once upon a time in 2003, the beginning of end-times emerged from the now rotting carcass of a beast which would promulgate the plague known as social networking websites. A false prophet by the name of "Friendster" would convert millions of casual web surfers into stalwart clones in an experiment to breed social awkwardness and pave the way for a cyberdystopian future. Once hooked, the true king of deception and misery rose from the shallow waters of punch bowls at social gatherings to sweep up unsuspecting victims and indoctrinate them into Satanbook, also commonly known as Facebook. This was a master plan to decrease church attendance and ultimately doom weak relationships with a reliance on empty titles and cute, tiny heart icons.

    Experimental psychologist Richard Beck postulates that Facebook along with modern technology is part of the reason why church attendance has been declining in recent years. Despite Gallup polls showing that church attendance in America has been slowly increasing over the last few years, he brings up some interesting points which are worth reading if you're desperately trying to cling to the notion that Americans are ditching their Sunday best for unwashed undies and a can of Bud Light.

    The idea behind this is that the advent of mobile phones and the Internet has stripped away part of the appeal of going to church - which according to Richard Beck, is to socialize and see people en-masse or "in Mass" if you want to get clever. While that shouldn't be the primary reason for attending church, those who are otherwise disinterested or lulled to sleep by the words of God would justify the commute with social interactions afterwards. However, with the reliance on electronic devices to communicate with friends and family, why would these specific church-goers keep attending when they can lounge around at home and send quick messages to their God-fearing buddies? Generation Y or "Millennials" have been shaped by the rise of instant communication technologies and it shows. 

    Richard Beck writes,

    "Well, if church has always been kind of lame and irritating why did people go in the first place? Easy, social relationships. Church has always been about social affiliation. You met your friends, discussed your week, talked football, shared information about good schools, talked local politics, got the scoop, and made social plans ("Let's get together for dinner this week!"). Even if you hated church you could feel lonely without it. Particularly with the loss of "third places" in America."

    It's not a novel idea, and I can certainly tell you that with a straight face. It heavily borrows upon the reality that the information age has given us tremendous advantages and convenience at the expense of formal social gatherings in many cases. The cause and effect is universal in that the implications for our reliance on technology don't solely affect the church, meaning Beck's postulation is a futile, yet interesting one. It brings forth the discussion of the impact social networking websites and mobile devices have on our society. You see, I'm not disputing the idea that instant communication has caused church attendance to dwindle, but I don't believe it should be looked at as a major proponent when plenty of other valid reasons exist, such as child molestation cases, religious wars and other catastrophes.

    We've come a long way since the days of fear mongering when cellular phones were more popular than OJ Simpson's gloves. Brain tumors, remember that? One can only imagine the stories circulating about the dangers of cellphone use back then. While I've seen some strange things in New York City, I'm not walking amongst a society of people with head protrusions just yet. I'm still waiting for these adverse effects to render all cellphone users useless and disfigured so I can sit upon my makeshift throne of abandoned BlackBerry phones. Beepers are a thing of the past, my friends.

     

    The "computer nerd" stereotype is vanishing faster than Sammy Sosa's natural pigmentation and it isn't uncommon for your average person to sit in front of the computer playing shitty virtual Facebook games for hours on end, while telling Emily all about their latest bowel movements. These are hours spent socializing in one of the lowest possible forms while options to go out and meet up with friends or family usually exist in the same instances. It may be a comfort zone for some people, but it's a vicious cycle which eventually weakens social skills which are a great asset to have, especially when interviewing for jobs.

     

    Even your average trashy clubber will devote hundreds of hours to multiple networking sites perfecting their online persona and showing off their drunken, googly-eyed faces in dimly lit pictures. In other words, just because you go out and get wasted on the weekends it doesn't mean that you have good social skills. You'll end up on Facebook during the rest of the week for countless hours again, until you can get inebriated and lose all forms of judgment on Saturday night. Are we living two separate lives? Which of your two lives gets the most of your time?

    It seems as if everything imaginable is being affected. Video games have long been an activity requiring you to have friends over for some fun multiplayer sessions. Almost all games feature a single-player campaign, but beginning with the original Xbox, an emphasis has been put on the online features. Now we have game consoles with Twitter and Facebook integration to further keep us glued to our television sets and away from smelly real-life people. While it's undoubtedly cool and totally optional, I feel uneasy knowing that new ways to keep us in front of our sets are being developed every day. I wish I could still call up some buddies for a game of baseball, but they would much rather spend the day text-messaging their hussies.

    It has become increasingly difficult to interact with people because they're always checking their phones for messages, or picking up and talking while we're hanging out (I'm sure you all know what I'm talking about). It's a challenge to come across others who can keep up in conversation or learn the art of being tactful or "classy" as they say. In no way am I saying I'm completely innocent because I'm sure I've been guilty of some of these things before, but I make an effort to better myself. We have technology that's constantly advancing and making life easier to manage, but like all great innovations, we must learn how to use it in ways that will advance us as a species. Some of these people out there, though... God help me. God help us all.

     

    Do you blame a disinterest in church on the ease of socializing through mobile devices?
    How often are you socializing online, and is it more often than you'd like?

    Tell me what your thoughts are on the dominance of social networking sites.

     

     

Comments (11)

  • nodnarbassoon@xanga

    I'm not sure there'd be a significant difference... I'm wondering what kind of experiment this psychologist did, and if they were really able to deduce a causation.


    I would be really surprised. No I don't think that social networking has much to do with church attendance. In fact, my church uses social networking to organize itself, and allows members to text anonymous questions to the pastor on occasion.
    I will, however, agree with most other complaints about social networking and reducing meaningful personal interactions.
  • ColomoTheRed@xanga

    While normally I would go with my normal line of "this is too heavy for mancouch", I liked this particular post because it was a little less offensive than usual to us Christian folks, and a little more thought provoking.

    I think the relationship between the rise of social media and the decline of church attendance is interesting, and I wouldn't mind seeing some studies or a book or two on the subject - done scientifically of course. I don't know how social media accounts for the shift between denominational church goers (losing attendance) and non-denominational church goers (gaining attendance) is accounted for though, with regards to social media.

    Broadly, I would say that the availability of uncensored information on the internet has a lot to do with the shift in attendance.

  • MrsJenBean@xanga

    I blame the disinterest in church on a general lack of real piety on the part of people. I blame the public rudeness on short attention spans and lack of self-discipline.

  • Japanesenightpurplegeisha@xanga
  • CastigadoR@xanga

    I'm just glad I don't have facebook. The only social networking site I've been glad to "dominate" me, is Xanga and it's affiliate sites(like Mancouch). But hopefully I can break out of it's grip too. Either way, Xanga has been much better than other social networks, past or present, and that's saying a lot.

  • godisinthewind@xanga

    I really liked this post. Thanks so much. I recently have pulled away from Facebook. Sure, it's great to meet up with old contacts (sorta) but then exchange a number, get together, and get off the computer. I found that the 'speed dating' style of facebook was fast replacing real social contact in my life. I met up with an old friend. Kept saying 'sure, we'll get together, ' always knowing she was there on FB... then a few weeks ago she suddenly died. Brain cancer. That alone made me re-evalute being on there. I actually blogged about this exact same thing recently. I'm not overly religious, in fact im a neopagan, however I have found a group of really great people at my local Anglican church and I've gotten involved in running the church website and going to events.

  • Spectrophile@xanga

    I've never been a member of a church in my life, so facebook has not prevented me from going to church. I think I understand - in a broader scope - what you are saying though. You could easily swap 'church' for other places where people socialise, after all. There seems to be a correlation between technological reliance and the breakdown of people skills. Ironically, it seems we aren't as connected as we were as a society long ago when we didn't have all these gadgets. People actually had to talk with other people in real life to get things they want *shock*. When money isn't an issue, I join sporting clubs n' such to meet new people etc. I find it a much more rewarding experience than communicating online.

  • alwateen@xanga

    I want to pull out of facebook - but I can't because I just want to know what others are doing... I can know them better that way...

  • Jal_Phoenix@xanga

    I use Facebook to keep up with old friends who aren't in my life anymore.  I spend maybe ten minutes a day on it.  I can't understand why people I see at work everyday want to keep up with me in my private life.  I don't accept friend invites from anyone except those I'm not in touch with anymore.

    As for the church attendance connection, I'm betting lack of attendance is more based on people waking up to what religion is than Facebook's doing.  Less church attendance, fewer churches and less religion in the world is a good thing. 

  • bdel008

    I don't know, facebook doesn't give me free coffee and pastries, unless in the form of a "gift."

    as far as the internet's taking over of our daily lives, I'll let the wisdom of Randy Marsh do the speaking....

    "We, as a country, must stop over logging-on. We must use the internet
    only when we need it. It's easy for us to think we can just use up all
    the internet we want. But if we don't treat the internet with the RESPECT (pounds the podium with his fist...)that it deserves, it could one day be gone forever. So let us learn to live
    with the internet not for it. No more browsing for no apparent reason.
    No more mindlessly surfing on our laptops while watching television. And
    finally, we must learn to only use the internet for porn twice a day.
    Max."

  • long

    Since George Coach Outlet Online Store Vuitton, the Coach Factory son of Louis Vuitton Sunglasses Louis Vuitton Coach Factory Outlet Online created Louis Coach Factory Store Online Vuitton Monogram Coach Factory Store Canvas in Coach Outlet 1896; the Coach Outlet Online company began Coach Factory Outlet Online to establish Coach Outlet Online its worldwide Coach Factory Online prestige. TodayCoach Factory Outlet, the quatrefoil Coach Factory Outlet and flowers Coach Factory Outlet Online symbol catch Coach Factory Outlet Online you eyes Coach Factory Outlet anywhere in Coach Factory the Main Coach Outlet Store Street, luxury Coach Outlet hotel and Coach Factory Online grand casinoCoach Factory Store. This legendary Coach Outlet Online design embodies Coach Factory Outlet Online both Oriental Coach Outlet and Late Coach Outlet Store Online Victorian style Coach Outlet Store Online with combination Coach Factory Online of durabilityCoach Factory Outlet, flexibility and Coach Bags convenience. Louis Coach Outlet Online Vuitton Monogram Coach Outlet Online Canvas features Coach Factory Online the highest Coach Outlet Store Online materials and Coach Outlet craftsmanship which Coach Factory Store Online make it Coach Factory Outlet fit for almost any situation in daily life. That’s why it has been sought after by both bag aficionados and pragmatists

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

About the Author

  • AsylumBlue@datingish
    • From: AsylumBlue@datingish
    • Name: AsylumBlue
    • Location: New York City, New York, United States
    • About Me: The musician in me is constantly dueling with my inner writer, trying to take its place. What I'm attempting to do is allow them to live harmoniously, but it seems that I'm a terrible peacemaker, because they haven't stopped bickering or flinging spit-balls at one another. I write political satire, short stories, poems and... actually, I can pretty much write about anything; I'm flexible (not physically, unfortunately). If I had to choose, it would be writing softcore romance novels full of seduction, extramarital affairs and incredibly specific details. I'm kidding about that last part, I think.
    • True Lifetime
    Stats: This Week All Time
    Posts: 0 39
    Views: 0 138254
    Comments: 0 1311
    View all posts by AsylumBlue@datingish

Who recommended?