Tuesday, 25 January 2011
-
Whore-O-Logy 101
“If a key opens a lot of locks, then it’s the master key. If a lock is opened by a lot of keys, then it’s a shitty lock.”Really? I wonder who was the originator of such an analogy.
The question that never gets old (at least to me): Why is it that when a man sleeps with many different women, he is considered god-like, but when a woman does the same, she is considered a slut?
I thought we were past all of the sexism and the discrimination. Aren’t women up to par with men in all ways? Aren’t stay-at-home-dads all the rage now? YES! But only in my own little utopian world that is made up in my head.
But seriously, this idea always boggled my mind. What’s the big deal in sleeping with lots of different people anyway? It’s like setting yourself up for failure, you’re bound to eventually catch something or impregnate a woman/get pregnant.
If you are a man and you are humping anything and everything, or a woman who opens up to everything in sight, you are both, in my eyes, whores. Instead of a capital “A” (for adultery) on your chest like Hester Prynne inThe Scarlet Letter, you should all wear a capital “W”. You whores.
Imagine a society where people would be required to wear a “W” for "whore", a “V” for "virgin" or a “S.I.” for "somewhere in-between"? Life would be easier for those of us who actually care about our health.
Nevermind, life would not be easier. In fact, maybe it would just be harder. “Somewhere in-between” can be from 1 person to 6,589 people. What if you slept with a “S.I” thinking that on the spectrum, they are more (way more) toward the virgin side than the whore side when in fact, they are actually one number away from being a whore? You thought you were hitting the lotto but you may just be hitting up your local health clinic.
Wait, what is the special number that makes you a whore?Sleeping with 6 people? 14? 20? 435? What is that magic number, the deal breaker that tips you from a “S.I.” to a raging whore? 435 people you ask? Of course that is the definition of a raging whore you say but believe it or not, there are some people in this world who do not agree. They may actually even think that this number is quite low!
So tell me, ladies and gentlemen, what’s your deal-breaker number?
RecommendRelated Posts
Post a Comment
- Back to mancouch's Mancouch Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in mancouch's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)
About the Author
-
- From: Lindsey
- Name: Lindsey
- Location:
- About Me: I love cheese and chocolate...together...and Mancouch of course.
Stats: This Week All Time Posts: 0 11 Views: 0 39962 Comments: 0 274 View all posts by Lindsey
Comments (95)
O man if there was more than ..for example....fifty women in his life over the past.........month..
Yea he's a man whore
If they're clean (as in, get tested every couple months and always come back negative), then the number can be five billion for all I care. Hell, let it be a high number--practice makes awesome.
Instead of having shirts that identify how many partners one has, why don't we have ones that detail sexual orientation, so I know what I'm getting into? I'm tired of asking girls out that aren't actually bi or gay, they are just acting for male entertainment. You can have a shirt with a straight line, a bent line, or a question mark. And for the one on the question mark, there's two columns, one with a straight line and one with a bent line, and just carry a fabric pen around so people can vote.
Whores are fine. I wouldn't go as far as to try to clean one up for marriage material, but they're fine as temporary partners.
My definition of a whore is someone who sleeps around unprotected. Whether it man or woman!
Eh, if he'd been with more than 5 women in the past month. I know that's really low, but I'm really sensative to a relationship and I don't like to think of my guy with a bunch of other girls!! If he can't stay with one or two girls for a few weeks, then he has a problem. It's NOT THAT HARD to be monogamous.
I agree with you, but I don't think whore factor alone is anyone's business in judging another, unless they have a direct relationship to them where it is relevant. My deal breaker for a guy I'd say, is probably doubt the amount of people I've done (which, to all the smartypants out there, I will only say would be in the very low double digits).
@SentimentalDoll@xanga - uh... that's not low at all. I would automatically write a guy like that off.
Wrong blog. And I used to have an approximate number, but not so much anymore. You could have been with 10 guys last month, but so long as you're giving me a piece and I don't have to get hitched to your ass, I'm game. Marriage material? Hell no. Hit it and quit it? Hell yeah.
Number one: Why is this on Mancouch? Number two: I love how you women are so short sided to think, that the number of women a man sleeps with, is in any way, shape, or form, directly related to what kind of person he is, or defines a relationship and/or relationship potential. Numbers are meaningless and useless, unless you are an accountant. Get real and deal with your own personal jealousy and confidence issues, because you in fact, are the ones who create these labels and put such emphasis on them.
@mdongivin - @Kazydai - Datingish has been pretty slow taking submissions this month. So, I understand about sending this somewhere else. That Pothead post got over 400 comments due it it being one of the 5 recent Datingish posts.
@mynameisblueskye@xanga - Yeah, I noticed. They were on that pothead one for a while.
@mynameisblueskye@xanga - What I find hilarious is that they send these types of "reflect on your life" submissions to a website where it's either going to get completely panned or made fun of since nearly everyone here appreciates sarcasm and satire.
Given this site generates low feedback compared to the other Ish sites, so I can see why this place gets treated as Datingish's dumping ground.
Never really been with a guy who got around a lot, so I can't say what the dealbreaker would be....
I think it's not so much the number of people as it is the motivation for sleeping with said people. For instance, if you've been sleeping with 20 people in 1 month, chances are your quality of relationship (whether it is friends, friends with benefits, spouse, or a boyfriend/girlfriend/whatever designation you have) is not that high and therefore, you can somewhat argue that the sex was indiscriminately done. Indiscriminate sex is more of a definer of "whore" rather than actual numbers.
I guess you could probably call someone a whore who has slept with so many people that they have lost count, which again goes back to my point about indiscriminate behavior.
I would be the type of person who rather keep my amount of sex partners too myself. As long as she is clean and healthy, I don't give a care.
I guess I'm in-between? But yea the range: virgin 0, in between 1-20, whore 30+
@mynameisblueskye@xanga - Yup, gotta get checked!
I...am not...a whore...lmao...too funny...
My definition has always been that if they'll go after anything.. they're a whore.
i'm a prude and I'd go so far as to say that it's not the number, but rather the attitude and outward appearance of an individual that makes them a whore.
like that girl in the picture. when i see girls at parties wearing that shit i know they're being whores; even if they're not putting out, they're still doing it for some form of attention.
I like the term "raging whore" it makes me think of a scantly dressed woman thrashing about breaking things.
I don't have a deal breaker :] I'm not racist against races of sleepage.
this is sorta off-topic but i have a question:
don't people in high school know condoms? there seem to be more number of people in high school who already have kids than people in college and above (not including being married or have settled to actually decide to have a baby)?
I don't have a deal-breaker number. People who refuse to talk to people just based on one quality about them can really be missing out on some good people. The term deal-breaker just shows how we want people to fit into these nice little molds we set up through society's labels. But once you scrap the labels and the dualisms, then you truly get to see a person shine through.
Of course, this wouldn't be such a problem in our society if we didn't put sex on a pedestal. We have all these rules surrounding it, all these ideas, all this ridiculous shit. The fact is that sex feels good, and it feels good because that's evolutionarily good for the human race. Granted, I believe people should practice safe sex, but that has more to do with the health of the public than anything else. But if a person wants to have sex with a lot of people, why does anyone else care? Seriously, it's fucking stupid.
I think it's great. Just let the whores be whores, there's no point making a bad thing out of it because then they'll try and supress it and just do it on the sly instead. What you do with your own body is fine by me, but you're worthless as a partner to me because of it and I know not to waste my time.
(I especially think it's funny when guys don't think this applies to them)
lol seriously? @mdongivin - thank you.@f5ye_angel5@xanga - i think thats them being retarded/ inconsiderate.@Liquid_Pain_523@xanga - thats how i feel. people can do what they want, and works for them and is beneficial. but they should always use protection and should always get tested regularly/ be conscientious of who they're dealing with
sorry but i respect people way too much by attempting to label them on a topic that can go a lot of ways. if people do get with a lot of people very regularly you do know that most likely is a psychological issue they're dealing with right? people who attempt to label people they dont know will always fail. its like when people say 'oh connect the dots'-- but thats not possibe. because most dont know where the dots are, what the dots are. so will never see the picture.