Wednesday, 01 December 2010

  • The Internet and the Arts: Before and After

    In the beginning, there was work. People had to sow and reap and toil for their dreams. We had to practice, practice, and practice some more, praying to the heavens that the powers that be would notice us. Many musicians spent their lives and thousands of their own dollars in the music industry, never getting that big break that God knew they deserved. Poets, writers, painters, singers, designers, artists and artisans of all makes and models tried their skillful hands at being recognized, and only a few lucky balls rolled out of the cage and were called.

    And it was good, in its own way. Only the extremely gifted ever rose to the top, and even among them only the best were selected as the representatives of our culture. Was it a perfect system? Of course not. There were poor choices made, and even in those days some people got credit who probably shouldn't have. But it is my contention that there weren't as many mistakes made in those days. Conversely, I cannot deny that there were probably many people who may have been equally or more gifted than many of the most popular and most recognized artists in those days that were passed over by the Machine.

     

    Those days, of course, being the days before The Internet. 

    I assert that the Internet removed the old problems but in doing so created new ones. Now no one needs to be overlooked by the system, and people like Justin Bieber get down on their hands and knees every night and pray blessings upon YouTube, because they may never have had the opportunities they have otherwise.

    Unfortunately, that also means that I, the discerning critic, need to sift through much more silt before I find the gold. Why? Because in much the same way that not everyone is remarkably talented, not everyone is remarkably talented at picking out people who are remarkably talented. And now every wannabe in the world thrusts their demos, videos, and opinions through my aching eyes and ears.

    So is the grass greener on this side? I'm not quite sure. What do you think, men? Did the Internet bring more opportunities or just more noise?

    Image Source

Comments (8)

  • beforedawn@xanga

    "even within endless noise is a ring of truth... "
    B. Baggins...

  • methodElevated@xanga

    This is the age of information, and also the age of expression.  It's quite amazing to me that we have come so far that we can support so many artisans as a society.  Back in the day when everyone had to toil in the fields, hunt or care for the children to pull his/her own weight, so few creative minds were allowed to flourish because everyone was too busy keeping themselves alive to do anything else.  Once humanity figured out enough ways to store food and make daily life more efficient, other trades emerged.  These days, many individuals are able to do and pursue what they wish because we have such an abundance of resources, and now they can share those talents with the world.  Sure, plenty of it is shit, but it's also creating a boom of inventions and new ideas.  I would call that progress.  I can deal with the bad musicians, artists and poets if it means the once-ignored artisans can contribute beauty and function to the world.  And it also means that we're doing really well as a society.

    Many things from the past were lost because of the strict competition and secretiveness of artisans.  Damascus steel, for example, was one of the strongest metals human beings have ever forged, but the process of making it has been lost to the ages.  The people who knew how to make it died off and took their techniques to the grave so no one else could profit from them.  Copyrights and patents usually combat that now.  It is often more profitable to share your inventions with others these days.  You have the law to protect your intellectual/physical property for as long as it allows before it's up for grabs.  Once someone else gets a hold of it, they usually improve upon it.  With a few exceptions, it not only makes more money, it encourages progress and innovation.

  • OngishLyOngLee@xanga

    i'm not a man, but i think like one.

    my uneducated guess is, the silt and gold is relatively the same as it was before The Internet.  the only difference is, The Internet opened our eyes to the mass amount of silt clogging up the world.  before, people only knew about it if it was in their backyard.

  • TheDarkAndMisleadSoul@xanga

    "not everyone is remarkably talented at picking out people who are remarkably talented."

    I like that.
  • coolmonkey@xanga

    And I suppose you fancy yourself as one of those that are remarkably talented at picking out remarkable talent?

  • Huck

    @coolmonkey@xanga - Oh, I try not to make claims like that. I just know when I'm being sold something I don't want to buy.

  • Mangonese@xanga

    Nope. You see more "crap" because it's easier to find. It's not that there was less "crap" before the internet. It's just that it wasn't so available.

    This post is so focused on subjective issues that I can't even really discern everything you mean by what you say. What makes someone talented or gifted? What makes a work of art "good"? Things that you value in art are not likely to be the same things I value. I, for one, am glad that I have the internet when it comes to my creative outlets. Without it, I would not be exposed to as much art as I am. I would have never been able to really see Alphonse Mucha work, considering my library has nothing on him. Though I first came across a large portion of Degas' work in a coffetable book from our library, I would have never been able to honestly appreciate him as an artist without being able to see more of his work and learn more about his unique perspectives from internet research.

    And though I despise deviantArt with a passion now (in light of recent events), I knew it was never a place for artists to grow and never deluded myself.

    It's not the internet that is "killing" what you think is art. It's modern society. Arguably, modern society is nauseatingly attached to the internet through a sickly umbilical cord, but I can't imagine that being the sole reason why Americans and much of the world have this taste for "everyone can win!" and "get there fast, not with quality".

    People who are serious about artistic expression and who make it their life purpose will not be negatively affected by the internet for long. They grow up and realize the error of their ways.

    I think, honestly, we came out neutral on the issue.

  • jazbajunoon@xanga

    its more or less the same. think about it, before the internet, no equal opportunity really existed, it was very much about "survival of the fittest" ,still only the best rose through hard work and diligence in their respective arts, and many who deserved the chance didnt receive it and our cultures became defined by the likes of galileo, davinci and monet. in todays society however, we have too much of an equal opportunity heck, i could even sing something stupid and post it on youtube, and if the idiots of our society like it, then i can become famous. the internet has left no room for "art" to have a legitimate definition. the difference is, that the inopportunity of those days sans internet filtered the stupid from the talented, and therefore our culture is bareable. but on the flipside, todays society and its equal opportunites have raised monsters amongst artists, (kesha, snooki, gaga....just to name a few) of whom im afraid will re-define our culture for the next generations to come. do you want people to remember us by kesha or antione dodson's "run and tell that" some decades from now?  i think not...  ( i know i'll be turning in my grave, screaming : I NEVER EVEN WATCHED JERSEY SHORE!!!!! dont define my generation by it!!!!)

    nonetheless thoughful post! enjoyed it

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

  • Post a Comment

  • Say it with Minis! (?)

  • Profile Pic

    Default | Choose » (?)

About the Author

  • Huck
    • From: Huck
    • Name: Huck
    • Location: Olympia, Washington, United States
    • About Me: I like to think of myself as a pragmatic idealist, which probably comes from my existential background. I know what I want my life to look like, so I try to experience as much as I can to learn how to make it that way. I've been halfway around the world looking, and I can't wait to bring that world home again.
    Stats: This Week All Time
    Posts: 0 9
    Views: 0 14095
    Comments: 0 126
    View all posts by Huck

Who recommended?