Monday, 06 July 2009

  • Success! at the Disco.



    Guys over the age of 17, it's time to rejoice: Panic at the Disco (formerly with an unbelievably annoying exclamation point) has decided to split up. The lead singer and bass player are leaving and heading in what they're calling "a new direction" (read: poverty) while the other half of the band is still going to tour under the Panic name.

    Honestly, when I first read this, I got really excited about it. There was so much that was irritating about this band, it was kind of hard to list it all. To start, the first album had song titles that were about a paragraph long apiece, and the lead singer's voice sounded vaguely like a bleating goat being fed to a lawnmower. On the second one, he calmed down a little bit, but the whole thing kind of sounded like a bad Beatles ripoff. And now, the group is splitting, with one half keeping the name in a bad cash-in attempt.

    At its worst (or, so I thought), the band sounded like this. Agonizing:


    But then I realized something: the breakup is actually worse. Much, much worse. With the band splitting in two, unless something dramatically changes, there's going to be two bad bands where there was once only one. Now, the lead singer is going to warble and whine his way through our speakers in another form, while the other guys keep trying (and failing) to make Beatles songs. You know who made great Beatles songs? The Beatles! And since they're getting their own Rock Band game, we could just play that! Or, even better, we could just listen to Beatles songs!

    If you need me, I'll be listening to Revolver and softly weeping.



    So this is my plea: Panic at the Disco, please get back together. Put aside your differences. Two wrongs don't make a right, guys.

    How do you guys feel about the Panic! breakup?

Comments (41)

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.