Monday, 22 June 2009

  • Re: Twilight From a Guy's Perspective: A Counterpost


    How Romantic! A Sh*tty Actress and a Pederast!

    Dear Mr. Lynnjynh9315,

    I appreciate you taking the time to put yourself through the awful trials of watching Twilight and then writing us here at Mancouch about it. That took a level of balls, which you promptly lost when you talked about your enjoyment of Twilight. You see, Twilight is not just for girls. It's for 12 year old girls. Let me rephrase that. It's for 12 year old dumb girls. This was a cutesy vampire movie based on a collection of poorly written anti-sex screeds featuring two of the worst performances to ever occur in a feature film (was Hayden Christensen not available?) meant to capitalize on the disgusting emo trend currently infecting our nations high schools, making our teenagers wear their bangs over one eye and listen to awful unlistenable music. Now, let's take a look at the points you brought up shall we?

    "critics and everyone slinging praises at the series, calling it "the next Harry Potter", and applauding the film as a cult masterpiece"

    Critics largely panned the film. And I have never once heard it referred to as a "cult masterpiece." Neither one of those words describe this film in the least. It was a blockbuster and my brain can only comprehend using masterpiece in reference to Twilight as an antonym. Maybe if by cult masterpiece they meant that its masterful at creating a following of cult-like zombies I could understand, but I have never heard a single being use that term to describe Twilight.

    "It is, essentially, just a high school romance with a neat twist. That said, I really liked it (manhood check... am I still good?)- sure it's a love story, but that's not to say guys don't like a little romance too."

    Nothing says mature, intelligent romance like high school with a twist. That  same description could be used for a far more awesome movie called TeenWolf. I point this out because I, as a man, do like romance. I absolutely do. I just like it to be handled with a little bit of depth and intelligence and less sparkles and unicorns. See Eternal Sunshine for the Spotless Mind as the perfect example of an intelligent romance with a sci fi twist handled with a level of respect for the depth and complexity of human emotion.

    "This becomes overwhelmingly evident when Bella Swan and Edward Cullen start making out in her room and things quickly get out of hand. Sensing that he's losing control of himself, Edward breaks off and leaps away (fact-check: Edward's a vampire... you figure it out). You can see the torment and anguish in his eyes as he says "I can't lose control with you" and in that moment, our respect for Mr. gorgeous deepens considerably; he's more than just a pretty face- he is very (pardon the pun) human. He doesn't just love Bella- he cares for her... and he's deeply afraid that he could hurt her."

    So many things wrong with this statement. Yes, it is literally about him "losing control" as a vampire, but it's really about him "losing control as a man" and it doesn't take a genius to see it. The message is sex is bad. Men are mindless sex creeps who can't control themselves and women have to be protected from their evil sexy advances. Because no woman would ever want to have sex, right? I have no problem with people saying "hey, kids, you really shouldn't be having sex because of diseases and the worst disease of them all: pregnancy and all that junk." I'm super cool with that. Good message.

    I take issue with the message of sex = bad or sex = evil. Sex is not bad, it is not evil. It is a natural expression of love or lust or whatever. It is human, it is natural, and it is good. Teens should wait until they're ready, but teaching them that sex is bad only creates issues that will prevent them from living full happy lives later on. I do not have respect for a man because he's oh-so-tormented by his desire for sex that he just can't control himself, but pulls back at the last second from raping some poor woman. That is a sick man. And he doesn't just love her, he cares for her? Isn't caring for her part of loving her? Did I miss something? Try saying that to a girl sometime. "I don't just love you, I truly care for you." See how that works out for you. Sounds like he didn't really love her until he realized "oh wait, I may be nothing more than a sex-crazed, mindless male, but I just can't rape her."

    "let's face it: in a world of uber-power vampire beings, she's only human. It's all too easy to pick on wimpy Bella when she stands shoulder-to-shoulder with all-powerful "gods". She may be the immature one in the relationship- but that's hardly fair when her opposite could in the hundreds or thousands of years old... ... (forgive the age-estimate if I'm wrong- I don't salivate over every random fact in the series)."

    Wimpiness isn't about physicality. She may be weaker than them physically, but that's no excuse for weakness of spirit and weakness of character. And opposite a dude hundreds or thousands years old? That's creepy as hell. Some "role model" he is. Dude, if you're 100 years old and cruising the local high school for some 'tang, there is something wrong with you. I'm frankly surprised Edward didn't have a van and tickets to the Hannah Montana concert. Maybe she can take him to the mall so he can sign for her to get her ears pierced at Claire's. What would they even talk about?

    Bella: Oh, so what music do you like? I totally love the Jonas Brothers and Rhianna.

    Edward: uhhhh .... I once ate Johann Sebastian Bach.

    Bella: Who's that? Was he like a rapper or something?

    Edwards: .... yeeaaa something like that. ... Hey! Would you like some Starburst?

    Bella: Would I?!?!

Comments (141)

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.

About the Author

Who gave the eProps?

2 eProps from: