Hey everybody, look out! There's a brand new anti-gay marriage organization out there called the National Organization for Marriage, or NOM. It should already be clear to you that these people have never heard of the Internet and are hilariously lacking self awareness.
For starters, NOM is a famed internet meme. We've all seen it. But apparently this organization that wants to be taken very seriously hasn't considered the consequences of naming yourself after a LOLcat.
But the real reason for this article is that NOM is launching a new initiative called 2 Million for Marriage, or 2M4M, which is craigslist for lots and lots of homosexual sex.
For those unfamiliar, craigslist personals are divided in sections such as M4M, W4M, W4W, and so on. These stand for man for man, woman for man, and woman for woman. So when they call their initiative "2M4M" I assume they're referring to either 2 M4M listings or an MM4M listing. Go persuade those sections of the craigslist personals right now, just for funsies. I'll wait.
Yeeeeeaaa, that's right. No wonder they don't want gay people getting married. Then there will be no one to answer their craigslist posts about craving the butt secks.
Their website states: "Over the next two years, we will be organizing two million marriage activists from every state in the nation to form an online army of marriage activists willing to stand up for marriage on a moment's notice, sending emails and making phone calls to legislators whenever marriage is threatened." Oh, and to surf craigslist to try and get some sweet sweet butt lovin'.
And just in case you somehow don't yet believe that this organization is a parody of itself, here is their introductory video:
Is this organization fooling us and really just some hilarious comedy hoax?
Hah! That is a rather unfortunately hilarious choice of acronyms...
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Bahahaha. haha. wow.
HAAAAAA.
Those NOM people are stupid. Â This has to be a joke.
Om, nom, nom...
I just had a look at their site. Looks like they're serious. Seriously deranged.
Why don't they go after single mothers? They're not a "traditional family" either.
Lol XD I never exactly got what "nomnom" meant...
Hahah, this is ridiculous.
what's nom nom nom supposed to mean?
this organization is ridiculous. everything in that ad is both so disgustingly and hilariously wrong that i can't believe anyone would believe it or even take it seriously.
Don't you love how they mention "rainbow"?
LOL.. "taking away their freedom".. they mean taking away others freedom? Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? I hope they know that EVERYONE deserves that..not just ignorant, close-minded conservatives.
OMG. The NOM was funny, but 2M4M...ohGOD! I almost peed myself. That group is amazingly oblivious and I love it.
This post gets a 5/5 for hilarity.
@sweetNsour_dreamer@xanga - @sophia@xanga - nom nom nom refers to something eating something. So if you saw a fat girl eating a burger you could go "om nom nom nom" and so on.
I don't understand the big deal. I mean, what's so wrong with denying civil rights to one group of people and treating them as lesser beings?
It's not like doing that in the past has ever lead to any wars or anything.
There's a youtube video of that commercial mashed up with It's Raining Men.
Best.
personal choice here im hetro but.... I'm sorry but it seems i fail to understand mass murderers, people who rape torture kill pedophiles of every shape and kind women and men both who do and have done horrible things to "loved ones" people who simply love to hurt another and not an eye is batted at their nuptials in prison out of prison it don't matter none at all barely a blurb in a paper on the web and then nothing at all yet two who love and wish to share each and every moment together to hold each other safe from harm to protect and care drop the word gay into this mix and i don't understand why? what legal reason name one single legal reason not moral moral has no business with the law cause if it does what morality will we follow Christian, Muslim, Jews, Satanic, Wiccan, Buddha, Tao? these are all religions supposed to be kept separate from law or so i thought and again I'm sorry as i fail to understand
Nom nom nom, hahaha
@Neurotically_Mine@xanga - Pursuit if happiness is not a constitutional right, its just a phrase in the declaration of Independence. However the constitution described lawful marriage as a union between one man and one woman.
Besides that Marriage and the family are aimed at reproduction and raising children in a secure environment. Us conservatives don't see any reason to give marriage licenses to people with twisted and backward minds.
@John_of_the_bloomdocks@xanga -Us conservatives don't see any reason to give marriage licenses to people with twisted and backward minds. lol gotta tell ya..ever single day these type of people get marriage licenses, if not then tru tv wouldn't have a program ..no wives killin husbands er vice versa lol soo suggestion..physiological testing before any marriage license to make sure no twisted and backwards hetro's get married? we are all equal after all...
@beforedawn@xanga - I have much more of a problem with abusive marriages than gay marriages, people who beat or murder their spouses should be put to death.
The problem in this example though, is that gay marriages are much easier to identify.. While potential abusers are often difficult to spot, or else who would marry them in the first place?
@John_of_the_bloomdocks@xanga - The problem is that gay marriages are much easier to identify... so much of what you wrote i so full agree with cept this... i find men on men sex distasteful to contemplate yet woman on woman... damn...but john if they truly love each other ..truly now... are they really so horrible?
@beforedawn@xanga - I consider it more of a disorder than an evil, either way I don't think we should re-write the definition of marriage for them.
Apparently loving another human being not of the opposite sex is Now a disorder? because it doesn't fit into YOUR definition of what a "normal" relationship is?
@John_of_the_bloomdocks@xanga - ouch... you know thats a pretty big "them" you just used and the sole problem is is that you just ostracized a section of society by such a simple term... yet the subject itself means so very much to 'them" time itself was when i would have been ostracized myself for marrying another race and my child vilified sooo maybe i see something here you cannot... lol great thing about America is we are always allowed debate...
Recommend
Comments (127)
Hah! That is a rather unfortunately hilarious choice of acronyms...
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Bahahaha. haha. wow.
HAAAAAA.
Those NOM people are stupid. Â This has to be a joke.
Om, nom, nom...
I just had a look at their site. Looks like they're serious. Seriously deranged.
Why don't they go after single mothers? They're not a "traditional family" either.
Hahah, this is ridiculous.
what's nom nom nom supposed to mean?
this organization is ridiculous. everything in that ad is both so disgustingly and hilariously wrong that i can't believe anyone would believe it or even take it seriously.
Don't you love how they mention "rainbow"?
LOL.. "taking away their freedom".. they mean taking away others freedom? Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? I hope they know that EVERYONE deserves that..not just ignorant, close-minded conservatives.
OMG. The NOM was funny, but 2M4M...ohGOD! I almost peed myself.
That group is amazingly oblivious and I love it.
This post gets a 5/5 for hilarity.
@sweetNsour_dreamer@xanga - @sophia@xanga - nom nom nom refers to something eating something. So if you saw a fat girl eating a burger you could go "om nom nom nom" and so on.
I don't understand the big deal. I mean, what's so wrong with
denying civil rights to one group of people and treating them as lesser
beings?
It's not like doing that in the past has ever lead to any wars or anything.
There's a youtube video of that commercial mashed up with It's Raining Men.
Best.
personal choice here im hetro but....
I'm sorry
but it seems i fail to understand
mass murderers, people who rape torture kill
pedophiles of every shape and kind
women and men both
who do and have done
horrible things to "loved ones"
people who simply love to hurt another
and not an eye is batted at their nuptials
in prison out of prison
it don't matter none at all
barely a blurb in a paper
on the web
and then nothing at all
yet two who love and wish to share
each and every moment together
to hold each other safe from harm
to protect and care
drop the word gay
into this mix
and i don't understand why?
what legal reason
name one single legal reason
not moral
moral has no business with the law
cause if it does
what morality will we follow
Christian, Muslim, Jews, Satanic, Wiccan, Buddha, Tao?
these are all religions
supposed to be kept separate from law
or so i thought
and again I'm sorry
as i fail to understand
Nom nom nom, hahaha
@Neurotically_Mine@xanga - Pursuit if happiness is not a constitutional right, its just a phrase in the declaration of Independence. However the constitution described lawful marriage as a union between one man and one woman.
Besides that Marriage and the family are aimed at reproduction and raising children in a secure environment. Us conservatives don't see any reason to give marriage licenses to people with twisted and backward minds.
@John_of_the_bloomdocks@xanga -Us conservatives don't see any reason to give marriage licenses to people with twisted and backward minds.
lol gotta tell ya..ever single day these type of people get marriage licenses, if not then tru tv wouldn't have a program ..no wives killin husbands er vice versa lol
soo suggestion..physiological testing before any marriage license to make sure no twisted and backwards hetro's get married?
we are all equal after all...
@beforedawn@xanga - I have much more of a problem with abusive marriages than gay marriages, people who beat or murder their spouses should be put to death.
The problem in this example though, is that gay marriages are much easier to identify.. While potential abusers are often difficult to spot, or else who would marry them in the first place?
@John_of_the_bloomdocks@xanga - The problem is that gay marriages are much easier to identify... so much of what you wrote i so full agree with cept this... i find men on men sex distasteful to contemplate yet woman on woman... damn...but john if they truly love each other ..truly now... are they really so horrible?
@beforedawn@xanga - I consider it more of a disorder than an evil, either way I don't think we should re-write the definition of marriage for them.
@John_of_the_bloomdocks@xanga - This is why I don't like you among many other reasons.
Stop being so closed-minded. Your ignorant and narrow-minded ideas are only proving to hinder the progression of this country and its people.
@John_of_the_bloomdocks@xanga - a DISORDER? god can you being anymore of a prick?
Apparently loving another human being not of the opposite sex is Now a disorder? because it doesn't fit into YOUR definition of what a "normal" relationship is?
@John_of_the_bloomdocks@xanga - ouch... you know thats a pretty big "them" you just used and the sole problem is is that you just ostracized a section of society by such a simple term... yet the subject itself means so very much to 'them"
time itself was when i would have been ostracized myself for marrying another race and my child vilified sooo maybe i see something here you cannot... lol great thing about America is we are always allowed debate...